MODIFICATION OF COCONUT SHELL ACTIVATED CARBON WITH AN AZO LIGAND 1, 2– DIHYDRO-1, 5- DIMETHYL-2 PHENYL-4- (E)–(2,3,4- TRIHYDROPHENYL)-3H-PYRAZOL-3-ONE (DDPTP) AND ITS POTENTIALS FOR THE REMOVAL OF CD2+ PB2+ AND NI2+ FROM POLLUTED WATER

Amount: ₦5,000.00 |

Format: Ms Word |

1-5 chapters |




ABSTRACT

Modification of coconut (Cocos nucicera L.) shell activated carbon with an Azo ligand: 1, 2– dihydro-1,5-dimethyl-2-phenyl-4-(E)–(2,3,4-trihydrophenyl)-3H-pyrazol-3-one (DDPTP) and its potentials for the removal of Cd2+, Pb2+ and Ni2+ from polluted water samples were studied. It was activated chemically using CaCO3 as the activating agent. Proximate analysis on the coconut shell showed 8.7 % moisture content, 10.4 % volatile matter, 3.2 % ash content and 77.7 % fixed carbon. The developed adsorbent has bulk density of 0.46 g/cm3, pore volume of 8.0 x 10-3 cm3 and the conductivity was 37.9 µS/cm. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis showed that hydroxyl, carbonyl, amino and azo groups are present on the surface of the adsorbent. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) showed the micro-pores in the Modified Coconut Shell Activated Carbon (MCSAC)  while  Energy Dispersive  X-ray Spectrum exposed  carbon  as  the  major quantitative element  with 57 %.  Batch adsorption was carried out and the results obtained showed that, MCSAC adsorbed Pb2+ (98 %), Cd2+ (80 %) and Ni2+ (92.2 %) ions more than un- modified coconut shell activated carbon which adsorbed Pb2+  (79 %), Cd2+  (60.2 %) and Ni2+ (73.6 %) ions from aqueous solutions. The quantity of the metal ions adsorbed increased with increase in  initial concentrations, contact  time,  temperature of carbonization, the  degree of treatment of adsorbent and pH for each metal. The percentage removal decreased with increase in particle sizes of the adsorbent. It also increased initially with increase in ligand amount but later decreased. Competitive adsorption of Pb2+, Cd2+  and Ni2+  on MCSAC from their mixed solution showed that the percentage removal of Ni2+ was highest with 80.35 % followed by Pb2+, 71.05 % and Cd2+, 45.10 %. The analysis of adsorption isotherm showed that, adsorption of Ni2+ followed Langmuir isotherm than Cd2+ and Pb2+; Ni2+ and Cd2+ followed Freunlich isotherm than Pb2+; Ni2+  and Pb2+   followed Temkin isotherm than Cd2+. Kinetic studies showed that  the sorption of the metal ions can also be described by pseudo-first-order (Pb2+ and Ni2+), pseudo- second-order (Cd2+ and Ni2+) and intra-particle diffusion models for the three metals.

CHAPTER ONE

1.0      Introduction

1.1      Background of the Study

The presence of trace heavy metals in natural water has aroused the interest of many Nigerian scientists as a result of their environmental effects on the health of both plants and animals. More so, concerns about environmental protection has increased due to the technology1 development which keeps on changing, producing industrial product, as well as waste. Manufacturing industries have played an important role for economic growth in major countries. This sector provides services and product for better way and quality of life. However, rapid change in industrialization produces vast amount of waste and will cause harm and deterioration of the environment  and  ecosystem  if  improperly  managed.  Pollutants  from  textiles  industry  was declared as one of the major sources of wastewater in Asian country1  as it is considered as possible carcinogenic or mutagen. Apart from that, heavy metals such as cadmium, chromium, lead, copper, manganese, zinc as well as  mercury and  nickel are widely discharged in the wastewater from industries and are very toxic and harmful to living organisms by lowering the reproductive success, preventing proper growth and even causing death2. Some of the heavy metals are important for our body requirement; however exceeding the tolerance limit may create harm to body functions.

The most toxic heavy metals are Cd, Pb and Hg ions due to their high attraction for sulphur which will disturb enzyme function by forming bon d with sulphur. The ions will hinder the transport process through the cell wall, thereby disturbing the cell function. Other pollutants from the industries are phenol; from refineries, petrochemical wastewater, pulp mills and coal mines. Presence of phenols in water bodies caused carbolic odor to receiving water bodies, thus

causing toxic effects on aquatic flora and fauna3. Apart from that it is also toxic to humans and

affects several biochemical functions4.

Unlike organic pollutants, heavy metals do not biodegrade and thus, pose a different kind of challenge for remediation. To alleviate the problem of water pollution by heavy metals, various

methods have been used to remove them from waste water such as chemical precipitation, coagulation, floatation, adsorption, ion exchange, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis5-7. The production of the sludge in the precipitation methods poses challenges in handling treatment and hand filling of the solid sludge. Ion exchange usually requires a high – capital investment for the equipment as well as high operational cost. Electrolysis allows the removal of metal ions with the  advantage that  there  is  no  need  for  additional chemicals  and  also  there  is  no  sludge

generation. However, it is inefficient at a low metal concentration. Membrane processes such as reverse osmosis and electrodialysis tend to suffer from the in-stability of the membranes in salty or acidic conditions and fouling by inorganic and organic substances present in waste water8. Most of these techniques have some pretreatments and additional treatments. In addition, some of them are less effective and require high cost9.

It was only in the 1990s that a new scientific area, biosorption was developed that could help in the recovery of heavy metals. The first reports described how abundant biological materials could be used to remove, at very low cost, even small amounts of toxic heavy metals from industrial effluents9-11. Metal-sequestering properties of non-viable microbial biomass provide a basis for the removal of heavy metals when they occur at low concentrations9. Therefore, many

researchers have applied regenerated wastes to treat heavy metals from aqueous solutions.

The main objective of the method is to treat the wastewater before discharging to water source, thus  decreasing  the   threat  and  deterioration  to  the  environment  and  promising  better sustainability of the environment. There are many technologies that have been developed for purification and treatment of waste water including chemical precipitation, solvent extraction, oxidation, reduction, dialysis/electro dialysis, electrolytic extraction, reverse osmosis, ion- exchange,  evaporation,  cementation,  dilution,  adsorption,  filtration,  floatation,  air  stripping,

steam stripping, flocculation, sedimentation and soil flushing/washing chelation12. The selection

technologies must be analyzed accordingly based on several factors such as available space for construction of treatment facilities, ability of process equipment, limitation of waste disposal, desired final water quality and cost of operation. Mostly, all the technologies listed above are less likely to be selected because they required large financial input and their applications are limited due to the associated cost factors. Adsorption process is found to be the most suitable

technique to remove pollutants from wastewater. It is mostly preferred due to its convenience, ease of operation and simplicity of design. Apart from removing many types of pollutants, it also has  wide  application in  water  pollution control.  Activated carbon (AC)  is  widely  used  as absorbent due to its high surface area and pore volume as well as inert properties. However, conventional AC is expensive due to the depletion of coal-based source and especially for

producing high quality AC13.

To counter the high cost of AC, low cost precursors have been of high interest for researchers to replace the conventional AC. The factors affecting substitution of raw material are high carbon content, low inorganic content, high density and sufficient volatile content, stability of supply in the countries, potential extent of activation and inexpensive material6. The AC is mainly comprised of carbon with large surface area, large pore volume and porosity where the adsorptions take place.

There are some reviews reporting the use of coconut and palm shell for the production of AC14; however such studies are restricted to either type of wastes, preparation procedures, or specific aqueous-phase applications. But, due to the abundant source of precursors, with high volatile, carbon contents, and hardness; coconut shells are an excellent raw material source to produce activated  carbon suitable to  replace conventional AC14. Moreover, this  can  be  said  to  be, “substitution of waste to wealth”. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent could be improved by its modification. This is because; the functional groups on the surface of the AC could be improved by modification with a ligand that has electron donating groups like hydroxyl group,

amide group, etc.

It is the aim of the research to adsorb Pd2+, Cd2+ and Ni2+  from waste water sample on locally prepared activated charcoal from coconut shell modified with an azo ligand; 1,2 –dihydro -1,5- dimethyl-2-phenyl-4-(E)- (2,3,4-trihydrophenyl)-3H-pyrazol-3-one (DDPTP).

1.2.    Statement of the Problem

i.          In a developing country, the technology development keeps on changing, producing industrial product, as well as waste. Also, rapid growth in industry produces vast amount of waste and causes harm and deterioration of the environment and ecosystem.

ii.        These wastes enter the water body to cause water pollution and therefore must be treated before it is used domestically or otherwise.

iii.       Many techniques have been employed for this treatment but they are less likely to be selected because they required large financial input and their applications are limited due to the associated cost factors.

iv.        Adsorption process is found to be the most suitable technique to remove pollutants from wastewater due to its convenience, ease of operation and simplicity of design. Conventional AC could not see to that because it is expensive due to the depletion of coal-based source and especially for producing high quality AC13.

v.         Many industries and individuals discard coconut shell as wastes and this local agricultural

waste could cause environmental nuisance.

vi.        Coconut shell has been used for the production activated carbon but the modification of this adsorbent made from coconut shell with a ligand has not been executed.

1.3.     The Justification of the Research

The world production of AC in 1990 was estimated to be 375,000 ton, excluding what was then Eastern Europe and also China. In 2002, the demand for activated carbon reached 200,000 ton per year in United States. The demands for AC were increased over the years from 2003 and market growth was estimated at 4.6 % per year. The strong market position held by AC relates to their unique properties and  low cost  compared with that  of possible competitive inorganic adsorbents like zeolites6. AC is used primarily as an adsorbent to remove organic compounds and pollutant from liquid and gas streams. The market has been increasing constantly as a consequence of environmental issues, especially water and air purification. Furthermore, as more and more countries are becoming industrialized, the need for activated carbon to comply with environmental regulation will grow at faster rate. Liquid phase applications represent the largest

outlet for AC. In these applications, AC is used in the purification of a variety of liquid streams, such as those used in water and the processing of food, beverages and pharmaceuticals. The growth of the activated carbon market in the last two decades in the most industrialized region will very probably continue in the near future as more developing areas of the world will realized the importance of controlling water and air pollution. This demand can be satisfied considering the large number of raw material available for the production of AC, the variety of activation

processes  described,  and  the  available  forms  of  AC6.  This  is  why  we  ventured  into  the

modification  of  coconut  shell  activated  carbon  to  study  its  potential  in  controlling  water treatment.

1.4. Aims and Objectives of the Research

The  aim of this  research is  to  investigate the  sorption capacity of modified coconut  shell activated carbon (MCSAC) for the removal of Pb2+,  Cd2+ and Ni2+  from polluted water. The charcoal was activated with an activating agent (CaCO3) and modified with an azo ligand; 1,2 dihydro-1,5-dimethy1-2phenyl-4-(E)–(2,3,4-trihydroxyphenyl)–3H-pyrazol-3-one (DDPTP)  in order to improve its adsorption capacity and used to adsorb trace heavy metals; Cd2+, Pb2+, and Ni2+ from synthetic water sample. To achieve these, studies were carried out with the following objectives:

I.         Production of activation carbon from coconut shell using calcium carbonate as the activating agent.

II.        Modification of the coconut shell activated carbon with an azo ligand: 1,2-dihydro-

1,5-dimethyl-2-phenyl-4-(E)-(2,3,4-trihydroxylphenyl)-3H-pyrazol-3-one (DDPTP). III.      Evaluation of the adsorption potentials of the adsorbent with respect to Pb2+, Cd2+ and

Ni2+.

IV.      Evaluation of the influences of the analytical parameters like pH, temperature of carbonization, equilibration time(contact time), initial concentration of the metal ions, ligand amount, particle sizes, degree of treatment of adsorbent. V.        To study the adsorption isotherms and adsorption kinetics of the adsorption process



This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research


MODIFICATION OF COCONUT SHELL ACTIVATED CARBON WITH AN AZO LIGAND 1, 2– DIHYDRO-1, 5- DIMETHYL-2 PHENYL-4- (E)–(2,3,4- TRIHYDROPHENYL)-3H-PYRAZOL-3-ONE (DDPTP) AND ITS POTENTIALS FOR THE REMOVAL OF CD2+ PB2+ AND NI2+ FROM POLLUTED WATER

NOT THE TOPIC YOU ARE LOOKING FOR?



A1Project Hub Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project

Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09063590000

DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:

  09063590000 (Country Code: +234)
 
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]


Related Project Topics :

Choose Project Department