IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS ON UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC STAFF PERFORMANCE IN EDO STATE

Amount: ₦5,000.00 |

Format: Ms Word |

1-5 chapters |




ABSTRACT

This study is an assessment of the impact of organizational politics on university academic staff performance in Edo State, it sought to: ascertain the extent to which organizational politics influence organizational activities in Nigerian Universities, determine  the effect of organizational politics on staff performance in the Universities, identify the extent to which organizational politics affect the commitment of staff in the Universities,  assess the impact of organizational politics on employee recruitment and selection in the sampled universities and   investigate the impact of organizational politics on staff reward management  in  Universities.  Three universities,  one federal,  one state  and  a  private university were selected, and a sample size of 346 was drawn from a total population of 2,464 using the Taro Yamane sample size determination formula. Five hypotheses were tested  at  5%  level  of  significance  using  Friedmans  chi-square  test  and  the  results indicated the presence of organizational politics in the sampled universities. Specific findings are: Organizational politics to a large extent influences organizational activities in Nigerian Universities, organizational politics result in poor staff performance in Universities, organizational politics to a large extent affects the commitment of staff in Universities, organizational politics significantly reduces the quality of employee recruitment and selection carried out in the sampled Universities, organizational politics has   significant   impact   on   staff   reward   management   in   Universities.   This   study recommends amongst other things that management should acknowledge the presence of organizational politics and work towards reducing its negative impact, closer monitoring of political machinations in universities especially in the areas of staff recruitment and selection and staff reward management should be done to avoid reduction in staff commitment and finally that the positive potential gains of politics be harnessed and employed to champion causes and policies that will facilitate achieving university goals and objectives.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1          Background of the Study

Organizational politics is an inescapable and intrinsic reality, it is so intricately woven with management system that relationships, norms, processes, performance and outcomes are hugely influenced and affected by it. (http://www.alagse.com).

Psychologists and scholars unanimously agree that human nature and dexterity permeate both the public and private lives of individuals especially when motivated to satisfy personal needs, such as physiological, security, affiliation, esteem and actualization. The pursuits of these agenda inevitably generate acts, inactions, strategies and tactics collectively referred to as Organizational politics. This is also referred to as the struggle for who gets what, or who is stopped from getting what, in the organizational framework.

Business dictionary has defined organizational politics as the ―pursuit of individual agenda and self-interest in an organization without regard to their effect on the organization’s efforts to achieve its goals‖ (http://www.businessdictionary.com). It can also be described as self serving and manipulative behaviour of individuals and groups to promote their self interests at the expense of others and sometimes even organizational goals as well. (http://www.alagse.com).

Universities in Nigeria are the focal point of higher education in Nigeria. The country‘s educational system has evolved through various stages. Nigerian higher education originated with the establishment of the Yaba Higher College by the colonial government in 1934. (http://www.mapsofworld.com/)

Ajayi and Haastrup (2008) opine that the history of University education in Nigeria began with the recommendation of the Elliot Commission of 1943, which led to the establishment of University College Ibadan (UCI) in 1948, University of Nigeria, Nsukka in 1960 by the Eastern region government, University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife) in 1962 by the Western region, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria in 1962 by the Northern Region and University of Lagos (1962) by the Federal Government. Midwestern region opted for a university known as University of Benin. The six  universities established during this period 1960-1970 are still referred to as First generation universities. Babalola, Jaiyeoba, and Okediran, (2007) cited in Ajayi and Haastrup (2008) have stated that during this period, Universities in Nigeria were under the close surveillance of the government and appointments of lay members of the council, and that of the vice-chancellor, were politically motivated.

Over the years it has been observed that Universities are not free from politics within and outside the system. The determination of who gets what, how, when and where, manifests in the university system in various ways. Ajayi and Haastrup (2008) observe that government of the day interferes in terms of selection and choice of Vice Chancellors, Deans, Departmental Heads, and Directors of Programmes. Also within the system we see cases of selective employment, selective  appointments  into  beneficial  positions,  selective  and  delayed  promotion  –  with examples  of  seasoned  and  experienced  academics  who  over  the  years  have  acquired  the necessary experience, publications and exposures to be appointed Professors being denied promotion either because their ―files‖ have been declared missing or abandoned, or they are not

―loyal‖ to the current caucus in power, others include cases of junior colleagues being denied their Doctorate degree because they refuse to be in the same ―camp‖ or ―caucus‖ with their supervisors.

Campbell (1990) defines performance as behavior. It is something done by the employee. This concept differentiates performance from outcomes. Outcomes are the result of an individual’s performance, but they are also the result of other influences (http://en.wikipedia.org). Hellriegel, Jackson and Slocum (1999) see performance as the level of an individual‘s work achievement after having exerted effort (Hayward, 2005)

Ishak, Suhaida and Yuzainee (2011) in their work have identified and categorized the operational key performance indicators of academic staff in universities into five headlines namely; teaching and supervision, research and innovation, writing and publication, consultancy, services to University. When Lecturers are able to balance these activities and carry out each of them without leaving out any, they will be said to be performing adequately as these activities result in producing excellent students, break new grounds in the area of research, produce publications that will ensure swift academic progress and provide services that will bring funds and fame to the University.

Today, work in organizations require skill in handling conflicting agendas and shifting power bases. Effective politics isn‘t about winning at all costs but about maintaining relationships while achieving results. Although often portrayed negatively, organizational politics are not inherently bad. Instead, it‘s important to be aware of the potentially destructive aspects of organizational politics in order to minimize their negative effect and promote employee performance at all times.

1.2       Statement of the Problem

The  scenario  in  the  Nigerian  University  system  indicates  one  of  an  intensive  brain  drain syndrome especially amongst top cadre academics in the areas of research development and new

discovery/invention efforts, a failure in harnessing the many benefits of knowledge management systems and  consequently a poor learning experience,  transfers of outdated knowledge and eventually poor quality of final products (that is the students), other problems include a public display of jealousy, hatred and suspicion among staff members. This translates into half-baked graduates and result in reduced productivity and consequently hampered societal and national development.

The senior academics who often leave the university system attribute the exit to university politics. They opine that their competence/talents were not properly utilized by the university as a result of politicking and poor resource allocation. The determination of who gets what or who is stopped from getting what, when, how and where appear to be based on yardsticks outside meritocracy. This situation calls for urgent attention.

1.3       Objectives of the Study

The specific objectives of this study are as listed below:

1.   To ascertain the extent to which organizational politics influence organizational activities in Nigerian Universities.

2.   To  determine  the  effect  of  organizational  politics  on  staff  performance  in   the

Universities.

3.   To identify the extent to which organizational politics affects the commitment of staff in

Universities.

4.   To assess the impact of organizational politics on employee recruitment and selection in the sampled universities.

5.   To  investigate  the  impact  of  organizational  politics  on  staff  reward  management  in

Universities.

1.4       Research Questions

In line with the objectives the following research questions will guide this study:

1.   How   does   organizational   politics   influence   organizational   activities   in   Nigerian

Universities?

2.   What is the effect of organizational politics on staff performance in Universities?

3.   To what extent does organizational politics in universities affect staff commitment?

4.   What is the impact of organizational politics on employee recruitment and selection in the sampled Universities?

5.   What is the impact of organizational politics on staff reward management in Universities?

1.5       Hypotheses of the Study

The following hypothesis will be tested for the purpose of the study:

HA: 1   Organizational politics to a large extent influences organizational activities in Nigerian

Universities.

HA: 2   Organizational politics result in poor staff performance in Universities.

HA: 3   Organizational politics to a large extent affects the commitment of staff in Universities. HA: 4   Organizational Politics significantly reduces the quality of employee recruitment and

selection carried out in the sampled Universities.

HA: 5   Organizational politics has significant impact on staff reward management in

Universities.

1.6       Significance of the Study

The  study  will  be  significant  in  diverse  respects.  It  will  be  of  significance  to  academic institutions, employees and future researchers.

It is most significant to academic institutions/educational entrepreneurs and management staff as it will help them become aware of the dynamics of office politics and its effect on staff performance both personally and professionally.

It will help staff or employees identify politics and its workings in their organizations and adequately respond to it.

Further still, students and scholars will find it immensely beneficial as it will serve as a guide and platform  for  further  researches,  including  a  knowledge  bank  in  the  areas  of  organizational politics and performance.

1.7       Scope of the Study

This study focuses on assessing the impact of organizational politics on workers performance in selected universities (It covers areas such as the definition of politics, power and organizational politics, theoretical framework, usefulness of power and politics, performance, commitment, staff  recruitment  and  selection,  reward  management  and  how  to  deal  with  organizational politics). The study is limited to a Federal, State and Private University in Edo state; they are University of  Benin,  Ambrose  Alli  University,  and  Benson  Idahosa  University.  They were chosen considering their years of existence and generally accepted academic standard.

1.8       Limitations of the Study

Some limitations encountered in this research as peculiar to most researches are: the somewhat smallness  of  the  sample  size,  the  difficulty  associated  with  the  unfavourable  attitudinal disposition of some respondents whose honest opinions we sought but gave untrue responses while others rejected our survey instrument.

The survey research design had the limitation that it is one shot or at most two shots and this limited its ability to generate data with which to test causal relationships of variables without resorting to rigorous statistical analysis. It also had the limitation of some respondents being reluctant to provide answers to survey probes, they were then encouraged stating that responses provided  would  be  treated  anonymously  and  findings  will  contribute  to  highlighting  and reducing the negative impact of organizational politics especially amongst academic staff. Other constraints of the study include;

Time: Due to limited time given for the study, the researcher could not get all the information needed  for  the  study but  ensured  that  within  the  period  extensive  search  for  relevant  and necessary information was made and obtained.

Finance: Due to financial constraint, the researcher could not visit places where information relevant  to  the  study  could  be  obtained  but  funds  were  made  available  to  ensure  that geographical areas mentioned in the scope were visited.

1.9       Operational Definition of Terms

The following are definition of terms as used in this study;

Organizational politics: These are ―actions by individuals which are directed toward the goal of furthering  their  own  self  interests  without  regard  for  the  well-being  of  others  or  their organization‖ (Kacmar and Baron, 1999:4).

Power: This is the ability of one individual to influence others and affect their behaviours. Power can also be defined as a capacity that A has to influence the behaviour of B, so that B acts in accordance with A‘s wishes.(Ogunbameru, 2004:213)

Performance: This is the level of an individual‘s work achievement after having exerted effort.

Hellriegel, Jackson and Slocum (1999)

Workplace Politics: This refers to “the use of one’s individual or assigned power within an employing  organization  for  the  purpose  of  obtaining  advantages  beyond  one’s  legitimate authority. (http://en.wikipedia.org)

1.10     Profile of Organizations Understudied

1.10.1  University of Benin

The University of Benin was founded in 1970. It started as an Institute of Technology and was accorded the status of a full-fledged University by National Universities Commission (NUC) on

1st July, 1971. In his Budget Speech in April 1972, the then Military Governor of Mid-Western State, Col. S. O. Ogbemudia (then also a Visitor to the University) formally announced the change of the name of the Institute of Technology to the University of Benin. On 1st April, 1975 the  University  at  the  request  of  the  State  Government,  was  taken  over  by  the  Federal Government and became a Federal University.

Today,  the  University  has  continued  to  grow  from  strength  to  strength  with  a  number  of Faculties, Departments, Institutes and Units. Following NUC‘s directives, the University experimented with the Collegiate System in 1991/92 and 1992/93.

However, in the light of new developments, the University reverted to the Faculty System except for the Schools of Medicine, Dentistry, Basic Medical Sciences, and Institute of Child Health which  reverted  back  to  the  Collegiate  System  in  August,  1999,  with  a  Provost  as  its administrative head. The Faculties as presently constituted are those of Agriculture, Arts, Education, Engineering, Law, Life Science, Pharmacy, Physical Science, Social Science, and the College of Medical Sciences (which has three Schools: Basic Medical Sciences; Dentistry and Medicine; and the Institute of Child Health).

The  University offers  courses  at  various  levels:  Postgraduate,  Undergraduate,  Diploma  and

Certificate.

1.10.2  Ambrose Alli University

Prof. Alli established Bendel State University, Ekpoma in 1981 (which after the creation of Edo State in 1992 had its name changed to Edo State University). The idea of the University was firmly predicated on the dynamics of the rapid educational development. There was a yawning gap in the available opportunities for teeming youths, to fulfill their educational aspirations at tertiary level in Bendel State, these factors led Governor Alli to constitute a ‗committee on the establishment of a Bendel State University and other Institutions‘ on January 15th, 1981. The committee in its report recommended the establishment of the Bendel State University and two institutions of Industrial Technology. The acceptance of the report by Governor Ambrose Alli was followed by the preparation of a Bill to make provision for the establishment of the Bendel State University. After much debate the bill was signed into Law on July 14, 1981 and the first matriculation ceremony was held on February 8, 1982 with a total of 408 students matriculating.

Subsequently through an Act passed by the State House of Assembly and signed into law by the Executive Governor of Edo State, Chief Lucky Nosakhare Igbinedion in 1999, Edo State University has been renamed (Professor) Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, after the founder.

1.10.3  Benson Idahosa University

Benson Idahosa University is a private, Christian university in Benin City, Nigeria. A place where academic excellence is served with Godliness.

Benson Idahosa University is named after Archbishop Benson Idahosa, a Minister from Benin City, Nigeria. The University named after him was founded on the principle of evangelism which he preached and lived for throughout his life time. Benson Idahosa University was established to

raise for God an army of academics and professionals who will go in the name of Jesus Christ to the ends of the world to impart truth by precept and example.

The University previously evolved from an institute of continuous learning named Christian Faith University, established in 1994. Upon fulfilment of all requirements laid down in the Federal Government of Nigeria Act No. 91993, the Federal Government in February 2002, approved,  registered  and  permitted  the  establishment  of  the  Benson  Idahosa  University  to operate as a private university in Nigeria.

Benson Idahosa University is fully accredited by Nigeria’s higher education accreditation body, the National Universities Commission (NUC), and was ranked 2nd among private universities offering undergraduate degrees in the country.

All the academic programmes offered are accredited by recognised bodies, both nationally and internationally.



This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research


IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS ON UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC STAFF PERFORMANCE IN EDO STATE

NOT THE TOPIC YOU ARE LOOKING FOR?



A1Project Hub Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project

Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09063590000

DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:

  09063590000 (Country Code: +234)
 
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]


Related Project Topics :

Choose Project Department