SOME BIOMETRIC AND ALLOMETRIC GROWTH TRAITS OF PUREBRED HEAVY ECOTYPE OF THE NIGERIAN LOCAL CHICKEN

Amount: ₦5,000.00 |

Format: Ms Word |

1-5 chapters |




ABSTRACT

Fifty five (55) experimental birds were randomly replicated into 5 deep litter pens in the ratio of 1 cock: 10 hens. Like to like random mating was ensured to raise 200 chicks in the F1 generation. Chicks were subjected to measurements like body weight, body length, shank length, shank colour, beak colour, feather colour, feed conversion ratio, mean feed consumption, egg colour, egg fertility, egg hatchability, dead embryo and mortality at hatch and subsequently at 4 weekly intervals.

Data obtained from these traits at ages of 0 (day old) – week, 4-weeks, 8-weeks,12-weeks 16- weeks and 20 weeks were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a nested or hierarchial design and in a paternal half sib analysis using SAS (2004) statistical procedure.

Body weight was significantly different among the progeny and ranged from 30.33g at day old to1334.67g  at  20  weeks  of  age.  Sire  had  no  significant  effect  in  average  body  weight  gain (ABWG), expect at 8-12weeks of age. ABWG ranged from 85.05g at 4 weeks to 441.20g at 20 weeks of age.

There was significant (p<0.001) difference in feed conversion ratio (FCR) at 12 weeks of age. Sire had highly significant (p<0.001) effect on average feed consumption (AFC) from 4-20 weeks of age.

Sire had significant (p<0.05) effect on body length (BL) at 12 and 20 weeks of age. Sire had significant (p<0.05) effect on shank length at 0 week of age.

Sire had highly significant (p<0.001) effect on shank colour at day old and it ranged from cream colour to cream black colour.

Sire had highly significant (p<0.001) effect on the beak colour at 0 week, which ranged from cream to cream hazenut.

There were highly significant differences (p<0.001) in the number of white, light brown and

brown eggs laid by the hens mated to the sires. With respect to the down feather colour of the progeny, sire did not make any difference. Sire used made no differences (p>0.05) in the number of  infertile  eggs  laid  throughout  the  experiment.  Sire  significantly (p<0.001) influenced  the hatchability of eggs laid, the number of embryos that died in the shell and the number of chicks that died after hatching.

The heritability estimates of body weight (BW) ranged from 0.05 at 4 weeks to 0.54 at 12 weeks of age. The body length (BL) heritability estimates ranged from 0.06 at 4 weeks to 0.80 at 0 weeks. Heritability estimates of shank length (SL) ranged from -0.12 at 16 weeks to 0.80 at 0 week of age. Heritability estimates for shank colour, beak colour and feather colour were 1.38,

0.80 and 0.17 respectively. The average feed consumption heritability estimates ranged from 0.16 at 4 weeks to 2.00 at 8 weeks. Heritability estimates for feed conversion ratio ranged from -0.15

at 4 weeks to 1.15 at 12 weeks. Heritability estimates ABWG ranged from -0.10 at 16 weeks to

1.16 at 12 weeks of age.

The phenotypic correlation (rP) was in the range of -0.0178 between BW and BC at hatch to

0.6496 between BL and SL at 20 weeks of age.

The genetic correlation, rG (sire) ranged from -0.22 between BW at 8 weeks and BW at 20 weeks of age to 1.7298 between BW and SL at hatch.

The data on all the traits studied  indicate that the heavy ecotype could form a foundation stock for layer, meat and dual purpose breed development in Nigeria.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

Evidence  abounds  that  Nigeria  as  a  Nation  is  endowed  with  surplus  natural resources  that will make her self-sufficient  in animal  protein production  and  even become main exporters of all kinds of food items. According to Nigerianet (2003), Nigeria, being the largest  geographical  unit  in  West  Africa,  has  a  land  area  of  923,768  square  kilometers. According  to Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN (2002), Nigeria population  was reported to be

129.9 million in 2004 based on the projected annual growth rate of 2.8% of the revised 1991 census. At this given growth rate Nigeria population is estimated to be 141.1 million in 2007. Nwosu  (1989)  reported  that  of  the  one  hundred  and  thirty  three  million  (133,000,000) chickens in Nigeria, one hundred and twenty-three million (123,000,000) are local chickens. RIM (1992), reported that the native chickens constituted 80% of the one hundred and twenty million (120,000,000) chickens in Nigeria. This showed that ninety-six million (96,000,000) were native chickens.

The fact that some developed countries with far less natural resources can still boast of self sufficiency and their ability to export poultry products call for sober reflection among Nigerians.  Frommer  (2006),  the  Israeli  Ambassador  to  Nigeria,  reported  that  Nigeria’s geographical  territory is 30 times bigger than that of Israel and it’s population  is 20 times larger than that of Israel. Annual rainfall in Israel ranges from 28 inches (70cm) in the north to less than 2 inches (5cm) in the south. Despite the obvious disparity in natural resources between Nigeria and the State of Israel, it is believed that the Israel model of agricultural and research development with some necessary modifications could be applied in Nigeria. Israeli livestock output for instance, in 2004  was worth US $1.4 billion (39%) and crops US $2.5 billion (61%). Israel produced almost 70% in monetary terms of its food requirements.  The recent purchase of twenty five thousand (25,000) day old broiler chicks from Israel by the Animal  Science  Department  of  the  University  of  Nigeria,  Nsukka,  in  her  HUJII  broiler project, to a large extent, substantiates the Israeli Ambassador’s claims. Moreover,  the records  of numerous  poultry  breeds  genetically  developed  in  other continents as far back as the nineteenth century is equally interesting. According to the New Encyclopedia   Britannica   (1995)   the  Barred   Plymouth   Rock,   the   American   breed   of importance today was developed in 1865 by crossing Dominique with the Black Cochin. The Wyandotte  (an America  breed)  developed  from five or  more strains  and breeds  has eight varieties. Rhode Island Red (RIR) developed in 1857 was from red Malay game fowl crossed with reddish coloured shanghais with some brown leghorn, Cornish, Wyandotte and Brahma blood. It is good for meat production and one of the top meat breeds for the production of egg. It has bright red feather. New Hampshire  was developed in US in 1930 from Rhode Island Red. It is a meat and early maturing breed. The white Leghorn especially developed in the USA,  is  one  of  the  12  varieties  of  the  Leghorn  breed  which  originated   in  Italy,  a Mediterranean breed. The white Leghorn is the leading egg producer of the world. Cornish, an  English  breed,  developed  for  crossbreeding  programmes   for  broiler  production  was developed  in  England  before  1893.  It  is  a poor  egg  producer.  The  white  Plymouth  was registered in USA in 1888. Brahma is the only Asiatic breed of significance today developed in  India.  It  has  three  varieties.  The  breeds  of  chicken  are  classified   into  American, Mediterranean, European and Asiatic, depending on the regions of the world where they were developed.  The shika brown breed has been developed in NAPRI, Shika, Zaria. That means there is no African class of chicken. This buttresses the fact that while the Europe, America and Asia have for over a century been milking great  income from their developed  poultry breeds and other developed natural resources, Africa including Nigeria has been sleeping and groping in the dark due to many technical, socio-economic, organizational, constitutional  and institutional problems.

These considerations pose some urgency on animal scientists and the entire nation of the need to put into motion every programme  and action that will make it possible for our nation, Nigeria, to consolidate its claim as the “giant of Africa”. Nigeria would have to fulfil the proverb, “the proof of the pudding is in the eating”, by developing breeds of poultry for Africa that will be called truly African breeds. It could be observed with some confidence that the various studies carried out on gene characterization; improvement  potential for meat and egg  production;  biometric,  allometric  and  anthropometric   indices  of  the  Nigerian  local chicken in cited works of Hill (1954), Nwosu (1990);  have served enough background work to justify actual breeding plans for breed development  in Nigeria in the 21st  century. These studies  done in the past  laid  a foundation  for the recent findings  that the light and heavy ecotypes  both   genetically   and  phenotypically   differ  (Momoh  2005).  Management   and nutrition  affect  the performance  of both the heavy ecotype  and the light ecotype.   Heavy ecotype performs better than light ecotype and the battery cage performance has an edge over that in the deep litter (Tule 2005). The local chicken by nature is rugged and would require a feed of intermediate  standard rather than depending  on/or adopting the standard form from improved  breeds  put forward  by NRC  (Tule  2005).  The relevance  of the ongoing  Ph. D research works of Ogbu, Cosmos and Ewa, Vivian, who are supervised by Professor Emeritus Dr. C.C.  Nwosu on selection for growth and egg laying parameters on the heavy ecotype and light ecotype of the Nigerian local chicken is indisputable in the characterization  of the local chicken  of Nigeria.  The  researches  and findings  so far carried  out on the Nigerian  local chicken put the goal of breed development in Nigeria on course. The findings will provide the basis for the development of a poultry breed in Nigeria.

Great  care,  therefore,  must  be  taken  to  equally  develop  the  best  plan  that  can maximally utilize the information found on the Nigerian Heavy and Light ecotype chicken for the  purpose  of  developing  a  new  breed  at  a  minimal  cost  and  shortest  possible  time. According to FAO (2004), strategies to develop poultry breeds suitable for family poultry in tropical countries  must differ from those used in intensive  production  and should focus on improving indigenous  breed, while also making use of pure, exotic and crossbred chickens where  appropriate.  FAO  (2004)  and  Nwosu  (1989)  recommended  the  following  rules  in improving  the  Nigerian  breed  (i)  Germplasm  in  the  traditional  condition  should  not  be modified until management  and housing have been improved, even then selection should be restricted to local breed, FAO (2004). (ii) When technical conditions are optimum and a ready market exist for the products, then the improved  breeds, crosses and hybrid that have been selected for high performance can be introduced into the peri urban system even at small scale level (FAO, 2004). Hence according to Nwosu (1989) (an unpublished  research work) care

must be taken to avoid the mistakes of the scientists and government  of Nigeria in the past before publication  of Agricultural  policy for Nigeria, which almost destroyed the hardy and less  productive  local  breeds  by  indiscriminate  crossing  of  local  breeds  of  livestock  and poultry. Replacement of local breeds with exotic breeds as a development strategy is a wrong strategy. Any breeding programme  that excludes  local genetic resource may be unrealistic. Appropriate rules and breeding programmes for the development of Nigeria breeds of poultry may indeed include pure breeding and selection programmes of the heavy and light ecotypes of the Local chickens in order to produce a Nigerian broiler, layer or dual purpose.

Pure breeding is a type of inbreeding where by mating is carried out between relatives (Pirchner  1969) or inbreeding  involves  mating  between  a male and female  who are more related than the average of the population. Pure breeding of heavy ecotype of Nigerian local chicken means a mating between a heavy ecotype male and heavy ecotype female. Burdette (1963) described  this kind of mating as incross, which  is one of the four kinds of mating. Other  matings   include   crosses,   backcrosses   and   intercrosses.   Allelemorph   A  and  its alternative allele may be used to describe dominant and recessive alleles on a particular locus. AA x AA and aa x aa represent matings of like homozygotes or incrosses. Purebreeding of the heavy ecotype can be designated as AA x AA whereas that of the light ecotypes as aa x aa. The  breeding  system  was  also  categorized  into  seven  systems  by  Burdette  (1963).  The purebred  experimental  work  will  make  use  of  the  first  breeding  system  (random-mating system).  According  to Pirchner  (1969)  the  principal  tools  for improvement  are  selection, inbreeding and crossing. Which of these combinations to use depends on the species, breeding goal, trait, breeding structure and other considerations.  If the additive – genetic variance is reasonably important, selection is the proper method. If genotypic variation is non-additive, selection  alone  will  be  inefficient.  If  dominance,  particularly  over  dominance  effect,  is operational,  inbreeding  followed  by crossing  or  selection  will  be successful.  At any rate crossbreeding  is important.  If epistatic  effect  is the mode  of gene  action,  inbreeding  and selection are efficient. Pedigree breeders particularly elite group must practice pure breeding or even inbreeding and selection (Pirchner 1969).

1.1        Objectives of The Pure Breeding Experiment

(A) MAIN OBJECTIVE:  To achieve a genetic improvement  of the heavy ecotype of  the local chickens of Nigeria through like to like matings.

(B) SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:

i.   To investigate data on body weight, body weight gain, egg performance of purebreds of the heavy ecotype of the Nigerian local chicken and make comparisons  between the purebred  generation  and  the random-bred  population  of heavy  ecotype  in the farm.

ii.   To determine body length, shank length, feather, beak and egg colour characteristics of  the  random-bred  population  and  purebreds  of  the  heavy  ecotype  of  the  local chicken and make comparisons between them.

iii.   To investigate the hatchability percentages so that the best condition for hatchability using the backward integration method can be determined.

iv.   To estimate  the heritability  of body weight,  body weight gain, body length,  shank length, feather colour, beak and egg colour through the sire components analysis (Sib analysis or Estimation of heritability from half Sibs).

v.   To   investigate   other   genetic   parameters   such   as   correlation   and   regression coefficients.

vi.   To estimate feed indices such as feed intake, feed efficiency, (kg/g of gain) and feed cost per purebred  for the various ages; 0-8 weeks, 8-20 weeks and short  term egg production.

1.2        JUSTIFICATION

Intensive research work on the local chicken is justified by the following reasons:

a.   The renowned scientific work of Maughan (1978) showed that good health starts with good nutrition. Scientific research has linked the consumption of saturated fatty acids, found predominantly in animal fats, with increased levels of cholesterol and a higher risk of heart attacks, while the unsaturated variety from vegetable oils and chickens do not have that effect. The findings  of Obanu et  al  (1985) that the local chicken appears more compact and yield more meat per unit of live weight than the exotic; and contains smaller molecular weight fats with low Saponfication value indicate the need to develop a local (Nigerian)  breed of poultry with lean meat is possible and very urgent.

b.   The problems of low animal protein intake in Nigeria will

tremendously be addressed when novel indigenous breeds are developed through pure breeding to cause chicken meat and egg prize to drop drastically.

c.   Hitherto, work on the local chicken has been too broad. Researchers refer to the local chicken as if all local brids are of the same size or possessing the same characteristic. Through the works of Momoh (2005) and Tule (2005) it has become clear that there are light and heavy ecotypes of the local chicken.

d.   Since FAO (2004) and Nwosu, (1989) unprinted research work recommended that the germplasma of the local chicken should not be unscrupulously  modified but must be jealously preserved; this suggests that the gene pool of the heavy and light ecotype of the Nigerian local chicken should be preserved and utilized through pure breeding.

e.   The two tools for genetic improvement  are mating method or breeding system and selection (Burdette, 1963). It will be important to aggregate the genetic potentials of the heavy ecotype through pure breeding research especially considering  the recent reports of Tule (2005) that the heavy ecotype perform better than the light ecotype. Pure breeding  of the heavy ecotype  of the Nigerian  local chicken  presupposes  the mating of heavy ecotype males with the heavy ecotype females on a continuous basis for purification.  This is the same as mating of relatives, since all heavy ecotypes of the Nigerian local chicken have the same ancestors.

f.    Development of the indigenous species of poultry into pure breeds of known genetic merit will add value to our animal genetic resources.

g.   Such Nigerian breeds of poultry when utilized commercially will largely increase the

Gross Domestic product (GDP) of the Nation and greatly enhance our economy.

h.   Nigeria as a nation, desperately would needs to reduce the cost of foreign exchange expenditure  incurred  through  the  importation  of  fertile  eggs,  day  old  chicks  and parent stock to Nigeria. An indigenous broiler, layer or dual purpose breed developed through  pure  breeding  and  selection  methodology  would  not  only  terminate  this problem  but  also  at the  same  time  become  a  major  source  of generating  foreign exchange.

i.    According to Pekinbantams (2005), the United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa and America have their individual breed and colour standards. Nigeria also has need for her own breed and colour standards as it will lead her to the path of self- sufficiency instead of importation of finished products from abroad.



This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research


SOME BIOMETRIC AND ALLOMETRIC GROWTH TRAITS OF PUREBRED HEAVY ECOTYPE OF THE NIGERIAN LOCAL CHICKEN

NOT THE TOPIC YOU ARE LOOKING FOR?



A1Project Hub Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project

Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09063590000

DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:

  09063590000 (Country Code: +234)
 
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]


Related Project Topics :

Choose Project Department