A SURVEY OF INFLUENCE OF CONTINUES ASSESSMENT ON STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

Amount: ₦5,000.00 |

Format: Ms Word |

1-5 chapters |




CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1        Background to the study

The need to evaluate students after an effective teaching and learning process is necessary. To this end, educationists have introduced a method of evaluation known as continuous assessment, which forms an integral part of Nigeria’s new policy on education, published in 1977 and revised in 1981, 1983, 1987, 1989 and 2014. The new policy stipulates among other things, the use of continuous assessment for students evaluation instead of using the orthodox single end of course, of year, national or certificate examinations. According to National Policy on Education (2014) the primary education will have the duration of six years, secondary education for six years, which is further sub-divided into three years Junior Secondary School (JSS) and three years of Senior Secondary School (SSS). It enables students to acquire further knowledge and develop skills. The Senior Secondary School is for those willing to have a comprehensive education with a core curriculum designed to broaden students’ knowledge and outlook and large number of effective subjects for a choice of career.

This new policy started from 1982/1983 Academic Session. In 1976, Universal Free Primary Education (UPE) was introduced, Also in 1999 the Universal Basic Education (UBE) programme was launched and executed by the Government and people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to eradicate illiteracy, ignorance and poverty as well as stimulate and accelerate national development, political consciousness and national integration. The programme was flagged off in Sokoto, Sokoto State. The Universal Basic Education programme is Nigeria’s programme strategy for the achievement of Education for All (EFA) and the education related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs.

The implementation process of the programme has been on since 1999 but progress was hampered by lack of an enabling law to execute certain aspects of the programme. What a big relief it was when the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo signed the Universal Basic Education Bill into Law on 26th May, 2004, following its passage by the National Assembly. The Universal Basic Education Act 2004 makes provision for basic education. The financing of basic education is the responsibility of States and Local Governments. However, the Federal Government has decided to intervene in the provision of basic education with 2% of its Consolidated Revenue Fund. For States to fully benefit from this fund, criteria were established which States are to comply. The Act also provides for the establishment of Universal basic Education Commission (UBEC) to coordinate the implementation of the programme at the States and Local Government Areas through the State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) of each State and the Local Government Education Authorities (LGEAs). The Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) was formally established on 7th October, 2004. Furthermore the new policy on education popularly known as the 6-3-3-4 systems came into being. To this end most states in Nigeria desired to train teachers to be able to meet with new challenges in education but unfortunately enough trained teachers have not been available to man the education industry. The new policy on education (6-3-3-4) system concerned itself with qualified and dedicated teachers because of the emphasis on the use of continuous assessment.

  • Conceptual Background

Greaney (2001) defines assessment as any procedures or activity that is designed to collect information about the knowledge, attitude or skills of the learner or group of learners. Assessment is therefore a process through which the quality of an individual’s work or performance is judged. When carried out as an on-going process, assessment is known as Continuous Assessment (CA). CA is a formative evaluation procedure concerned with finding out, in a systematic manner, the over-all gains that a student has made in terms of knowledge, attitude and skills after a given set of learning experience (Ogunniyi, 1984). According to Aggarwal (1999), CA is not simply continuous testing. Continuous assessment does not solely depend on formal tests. CA is more than giving a test, it involves every decision made by the teacher in class to improve students’ achievement. CA may take different forms such as formal questions given to students during class, take-home assignments/exercises and recapitulation exercise.

Assessment is either internal or external. Internal assessment refers to school-based assessment. Which includes class assignments, teacher-made tests, recap exercises and field studies, all these tools form part of the classroom continuous assessment strategies. A continuous assessment strategy refers to the different tools/procedures used in the classroom to understand the academic achievement levels of learners in terms of their knowledge, attitudes and values. Also, a strategy in assessment is a purposefully conceived and determined plan of action. It is a pattern of assessment that seems to attain certain outcomes and to guard against others (Aggarwal, 1999). External assessment refers to test that are produced by examining bodies away from school.

 

 

1.2.    Purpose of the Study                                                   

The purpose of this study was to establish the effectiveness of continuous assessment strategies used by teachers on students’ performance in SSS3 in Ondo West Local Government Area of Ondo State.

1.3.    Statement of the Problem

The urgent need to promote learning and improve performance in secondary schools in Ondo West Local Government Area resulted into a range of related but different developments in continuous assessment at classroom levels. The resultant feature has been inconsistent performance of

students’ in Senior Secondary Certificate Examination (SSCE) nation- wide and performance still varies from school to school. This undermines the future of many students that are in schools that persistently perform poorly. What therefore remains disturbing is whether a relationship exists between continuous assessment strategies adopted by teachers of SSS3 in Ondo West Local Government Area with students’ performance in final examinations.

1.4.    Research Questions      

  1. What Continuous Assessment strategies were being used by teachers in class three of Senior Secondary School in Ondo West Local Government Area.?
  2. What was the relationship between the Continuous Assessment strategies being used and students’ performance in SSS 3 classes in Ondo West Local Government Area, Ondo State?
  3. What were the teachers’ perceptions on whether students exposed to various continuous assessment strategies performed better in the final examination than their counterparts?

1.5.    Significance of the Study                                            

The findings of this study will contribute in the following ways:

The research results would inform the teachers /trainers of the numerous Continuous Assessment Strategies (CASs) being utilized in SSS3 classes in Ondo West Local Government Area that these strategies should be emphasized during the course of teacher training.

Teachers would be informed of the alternative Continuous Assessment Strategies (CASs) that could be used to enhance students’ performance.

The research will serve as a foundation for further research that will benefit researchers.

1.6.    Objectives of the study                                                

  1. To find out the continuous assessment strategies used by teachers of class three in Senior Secondary Schools of Ondo West Local Government Area, Ondo State.
  2. To find out whether there was a relationship between continuous assessment strategies (CAS) used and students’ performance in the Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination (SSCE) in Ondo West Local Government Area, Ondo State.
  3. To find out the teachers’ perception of whether students’ exposed to various continuous assessment strategies perform better in their final examination than their counterparts.

 

 

1.7.    Scope of the Study

The study covered schools in Ondo West Local Government Area. The major emphasis was put on teachers and students of SSS3 classes. The study also revolved around continuous assessment strategies being used by the teachers and students’ performance in SSS3 in Ondo West Local Government Area, Ondo State.

1.8.    Limitation of the study

The study will be limited to fifteen schools (public secondary schools) out of the 31 Public Secondary Schools in Ondo West Local Government Area, Ondo State, due to time and financial constraints.

1.9.    Definition of Terms

The following terms are used in the study. They are hereby defined for the purpose of clarity:

Continuous Assessment: This is a mechanism whereby the final grading of students in cognitive, affective and psychomotor domain of behaviour takes account in a systematic way of all his performance during a period of schooling.

Assessment: This term refers to the methods or measures employed to determine an individual status of behaviour of how much of a certain trait an individual possesses.

Evaluation: This is a process where the parts of processes or outcomes of a programme are examined to see if they are satisfactory

Cognitive Domain: This is concerned mainly with the mental process by which knowledge is acquired. The cognitive domain deals with the recognition and recall of knowledge and the development of intellectual skills and ability.

Affective Domain: This has to do with values and beliefs, attitudes and appreciation, interest, social relations, emotional adjustment, habits and lifestyle.

Psychomotor Domain: This deals with manipulative skills and body movement. Example of this is writing smoothly and legibly, drawing accurate maps or diagrams, e.t.c.

 

6-3-3-4: The new system of education in Nigeria as spelt out by the  National Policy on Education (2014) broken down as follows:

6        –        Years in Primary education

3        –        Years in Junior Secondary education

3        –        Years in Senior Secondary education

4        –        Years in Tertiary or Post Secondary education

 

 

 



This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research


A SURVEY OF INFLUENCE OF CONTINUES ASSESSMENT ON STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

NOT THE TOPIC YOU ARE LOOKING FOR?



A1Project Hub Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project

Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09063590000

DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:

  09063590000 (Country Code: +234)
 
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]


Related Project Topics :

Choose Project Department